After reading Bell’s “Community and Cyberculture” chapter, I was struck by this quote:
“The study of community has been a sustained effort to think through this complex; to think about what makes a community. In a lot of cases, the way that is approached is framed around something that is perceived to be a threat to community-usually one or more of the transformations brought about my modernization.” (94).
This implies online community formation as threat, but what of the digital artefacts of these communities, the detritus of past communities built and abandoned? What about our collective Lifestream as a time capsule, a record for future civilizations to study our patterns of interactions and dependencies? The Onion offers a humorous and relatively accurate take on what this digital archaeology/anthropology might look like.
It does raise an interesting question. On an individual level, our imprint is to be found everywhere and this is how digital and physical cultures might disconnect a bit. Our record in this ecosystem is dramatically preserved, like “flies in amber”; never has so much data been available to analyze what makes us us. Records of our activities will be available that will ready like calendars. However, will this put is any closer to understanding motivation? Will a record of actions lead to an understanding of the facility of community association online?